@article { author = {Mashkāni, Zeinab and ̒Ābedī Sarāsia, Alirīḍā and Nāṣerī Muqaddam, Husein}, title = {Exploring the Guardianship of the Properties (wealth) Liable for Zakat with Emphasis on the Jurisprudential Principles of Imam Khomeini}, journal = {Islamic Government}, volume = {26}, number = {4}, pages = {33-62}, year = {2022}, publisher = {}, issn = {1561-008X}, eissn = {}, doi = {}, abstract = {Concerning the guardianship of the wealth liable for zakat, the generally accepted doctrine among Muslim jurists is that people can spend these collected properties for charitable and religious purposes determined in Islam. On the other hand, there is a relatively less widely accepted doctrine that holds the view that paying of the said wealth to the Islamic judge is an obligation. Grand Ayatollah Imam Khomeini’s statements in Tahrir al-Wasilah, while being congruent with the dominant doctrine, his words in his Al-BayÝ – which was later published – is in correspondence with the rather less commonly accepted doctrine. Drawing upon the descriptive-analytic method, and by means of data collection based on the library method and ducumentations, this article seeks to make study of the arguments for both sides, and to find an area of common ground between the two doctrines. The findings of the study show that there is some evidence for each of the doctrines. However, these arguments typically cannot take side with one of these doctrines and seem to be consistent with both in some way or other. The present research, having put forward two suggestions for removing the apparent contradictions between the arguments, looks at the possible soluion as well as the common ground between the two doctrines.}, keywords = {guardianship,ZakÁt,wealth liable for zakÁt,how to spend zakÁt,ImÁm Khomeini}, title_fa = {واکاوی ولایت بر اموال زکوی با تأکید بر مبانی فقهی امام خمینی}, abstract_fa = {در باب ولایت بر امول زکوی، مشهور معتقدند که مردم می توانند این اموال را در مواضع تعیین شده مصرف کنند و در مقابل، قول نادری وجود دارد که معتقد است دفع آن به حاکم شرع واجب است. سخن مرحوم امام خمینی در تحریر الوسیله، موافق با قول مشهور، اما عبارات ایشان در کتاب البیع ـ که متأخر است ـ متناسب با قول نادر است. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات کتاب خانه‌ای و اسنادی در صدد است تا ضمن بررسی ادله هر دو قول، به وجه جمعی میان آن دو دست یابد. نتایج بررسی‌ها نشان می دهد که برای هر قول، شواهدی را می توان مطرح کرد، اما این ادله نوعاً به صراحت نمی توانند یک قول را تعیین کنند و با قول دیگر نیز سازگارند. پژوهش حاضر ضمن ارائه دو پیشنهاد برای رفع تنافی ظاهری میان ادله، به بررسی این دو راه حل پرداخته و وجه جمع میان اقوال را تبیین کرده است.    }, keywords_fa = {ولایت,زکات,اموال زکوی,مصرف زکات,امام خمینی}, url = {https://mag.rcipt.ir/article_146845.html}, eprint = {https://mag.rcipt.ir/article_146845_6663c338d42c480364791b8d3673239a.pdf} }